Think You’re Safe from False Imprisonment? THINK AGAIN!

by James Bauhaus

In Arizona v Youngblood 109 s ct 333 (1988) police convicted an innocent man and imprisoned him for life using no evidence at all except the say-so of a ten year old child. How? By (1) Stealing the man’s car and destroying it so it could not be used to prove it did not match the boy’s original description, (2) By destroying the DNA and fingerprint evidence so it could not be used to prove mistaken identity, and (3) By sending a swarm of police and social workers after the boy and teaching him to point at and recognize the man police found easiest and nearest to target.

Like water, police always choose the easiest path. Same with judges, DAs and jurors.

Through long practice, these police and courthouse manipulators of the public can and do every day orchestrate the media, public and jurors to convict on cue, same as the musicians follow the bandleader. The hardened, non-rookies of the courthouse and police depts’ conviction machines are not interested in nailing the guilty person as much as they are striving to convict any plausibily convictable person, regardless of guilt! They get paid the same, either way, guilty or not.

Standard, routine, everyday procedure is for police to contrive evidence that convicts, trash evidence that proves innocence, and to Mainly rely upon manufacturing or training prosecution witnesses to attack their chosen accusee. Police, DAs and judges actually abhor physical, scientific evidence because it can’t be trained to point and scream “That’s Him!”

Police and courtcrats long ago discovered their conviction machines doze over their accusee-victims much more efficiently when they model their courtroom rituals after soap operas.

Evidence just gets in the way, and it’s boring!

Laws that help police manufacture prosecution eyewitness perjury sufficient for them to convict innocent people are those that give them immunity from civil suits. Only Maine outlaws this: every other state makes trial perjury immune to civil lawsuits. This means that when police trick, scold, wheedle, bludgeon, lie or otherwise convince their prosecution witnesses to lie you into prison, you can never sue them: they are completely safe to lie under oath in court during trials because (1) chances are you’ll never discover they lied and (2) even if you find proof of your innocence and proof of their perjury, they are immune to all lawsuits you can bring against them.

Worse, the courtcrats can prosecute them if the don’t lie for police! This is exactly what ‘Officer’ Jes McCullough did in my own case. The witness told him she knew I could not have been the person she saw because my hair was 4 or 5 inches too long and the wrong color. “Officer” McCullough decided to convict me anyway because he and another crooked cop, Larry Johnson, had already tricked an old woman into signing their statement against me. They were not about to throw away a signed statement just because it accused a innocent man. Instead, “Officer” McCullough simply wrote out a police report in which he merely lies, saying “Mrs Baker identified (me) as the killer.” Months and months later at the trial, other police simply pulled out McC’s lying report, accuse Mrs Baker of lying to police and threaten her with jail: Mrs Baker quickly sheds all her ethics and gladly lies me into prison in order to dodge jail herself. (Pretty neat trick, huh!)

Yes, the courthouse crews in 49 states maintain a monopoly on who can bludgeon who with perjury and who is safe to lie on the witness stand. Only Prosecution witnesses are safe from perjury charges and can lie at will for the courthouse crew/police conviction machines. Every tort law in every state has an escape clause for perjurors (except Maine):

Lying in court can not be sued for. Also, courtroom perjurors are immune to all civil rights lawsuits too, as are jurors, lawyers, judges, elected officials, police and govt

employees. When politicians proudly proclaim that “no one is above the law” they are not talking about themselves, prosecution witnesses, lawyers, judges, police, jurors, other politicians or govt employees: these people ARE above the law. They ALL have immunity from civil lawsuits.

Police are also assisted in Maintaining the conviction of innocent persons by crooked rulings of the United States Supreme Court (ussc). Even if you later are able to prove your innocence, the ussc says “Mere innocence is not enough to obtain release from prison.”

(If you’re not guilty, then why the Hell are you in prison?) You must not only prove you are innocent, you must also prove the prosecution violated one of the nine of your Constitutional rights!    (The tenth one, the one that used to “guarantee” your right to “(effective) assistance of counsel” does not count! Your lawyer can be as worthless as an anvil for a flotation device and NO federal court will even look at your brief. Why? Because most lawyers are obviously and completely ineffective. Since they are all worthless and the majority of them actually harmful to your cause, the federal courts simply STOLE this right so they would no longer be constantly deluged by it. Instead of cleaning up their own sewer, they just trashed this part of the Constitution instead, freeing lawyers to become ever more worthless, harmful and ineffective.

People on death row have proved their innocence and still the judicial system fried them. Why? Because the police were excellent at concealing evidence that rights were violated. The judges help them by making crooked rulings that say you must prove the police purposely and maliciously trashed the evidence. Police and DAs are especially trained to only ‘negligently’ ‘lose’ evidence. If they can make the judge think that the evidence just vanished and it was nobody’s fault, YOU LOSE: Worse, the judges are especially glad to see no fault with police when they ‘lose’ tons of evidence daily. Judges even help police destroy evidence by ordering (on the sly) warehouse-fulls of evidence ‘disposed of’ to, ostensibly, make room for more. Judges, police, DAs and even defense lawyers are glad and happy to assist each other in keeping innocent people convicted because hiding their crimes, mistakes and corruptions helps keep the ignorant taxherd respecting them and foolishly thinking them and their institutions infallible. The main business of the police and courtcrats is to facilitate their more efficient harvesting of the taxherd. This is not done by correcting mistakes, but by hiding them.

Judges screw innocent prisoners too by shifting unliftable burdens of proof onto their backs. After police have stolen, concealed and/or destroyed all the innocence-proving evidence, you must find it while in prison, prove police purposely destroyed it or lost it, and prove you couldn’t have found it sooner through use of ‘Due Diligence’ on your part.

Otherwise the judges refuse to even look at it, haughtily proclaiming that you somehow “waived” your right to bring up new evidence.

Finding it is next to impossible. Proving police purposely lost or destroyed it or concealed it is even more impossible. Absolutely impossible is convincing the judge you exercized ‘due diligence’ in finding it when you did. In eve    case the judge will claim you could have found it sooner, and since you didn’t find it before, you can’t use it now because you “waived your right” by not finding it the very second it COULD have been found.

By placing these impossible burdens on the fraudulently convicted, no innocent person ever leaves prison through proof of innocence alone.

Judges also assist crooked police and lying prosecution witnesses in maintaining the innocent in prison by the lawyer’s doctrine of “presuming themselves correct”. Specifically, this doctrine is used by appeals judges. Suppose that years later the police mistakenly turn loose of previously secret police reports that prove: (1) Police concealed an eyewitness. (2) Police concealed three eyewitnesses’ first descriptions of the killer. (3) Police concealed at least two drawings of the killer made by these witnesses, and (4) All three witnesses’ descriptions and drawings of the killer agree he had short brown hair when their chosen target’s hair was much too long and black instead of the brown they all three described. Obviously the two eyewitnesses that the cops did disclose did not tell the whole truth by ‘forgetting’ that the killer had short brown hair. Just as obviously, the eight cops did not tell the whole truth by ‘forgetting’ that the three eyewitnesses all had them and the rest of their police department buddies scouring the city looking for a killer with short, brown hair before they decided to target me and my long, black hair.

By using their “presumed correct” doctrine, 25 appeals judges in 7 courts all dodged justice, kept an obviously innocent man in prison, and protected the real killer from conviction by puking this nonsense: “The trial court judges are presumed to be correct in in stances of identification testimony by witnesses.”

Fact is, the in-court identification of suspects is nothing but the end result of in-tense police training of their witnesses. Police train their eyewitnesses more thoroughly than circus sea lions are trained to blow a melody on a rack of trumpets. Eyewitlesses are first trained to salivate at the sight of police-chosen suspects dragged up to them at the crime scene. Next, police train the eyewitless with pictures and lineups in their homes and at the jail. Next, eyewitlesses are trained to point at the selected accusee just before and during the preliminary hearing. Lastly, police and the DAs train the witnesses to point at the accusee before and during the trial. That’s seven times that the police and DAs train the eyewitnesses how to say they are “absolutely positive; that’s the guy!”

If they can’t get it right in seven training sessions, they must be blind, deaf and stupid. Anyone with at least two brain cells can seethe fact that the first description of the culprit is the most accurate and truthful. Obviously appeals judges dreamed up this “(the last training session at) trial identification is presumed correct” nonsense for one purpose: to help police and DAs continue their corrupt training of eyewitlesses and to prevent innocent persons from escaping prison by finding the unadulterated first, most accurate, most truthful descriptions of the real culprit.

Police, DAs, judges and lawyers all benefit profusely by maintaining this vast flexibility for their own use. Because they can talk any type of nonsense and make it stick, and trick willing, gullible jurors with it, YOU can be enslaved forever for nothing more than the fact that a crime occurred nearby and police targeted you for it.

Once you get eaten by their conviction machine, you’re gone forever. You will always remain a victim of their depredations in one form or another.

Another benefit judges give police is extra credibility: “Police testimony is the yardstick by which a11 other testimony is gauged.” This stipulation is in every law book, and nobody has ever realized (except the victims enslaved by it) that the police’s testimony is often more lies than truth.

The judges all use this police-more-truthful-more-accurate-more-knowing-more-every-thing” yardstick to ignore whatever you say no matter how logical or how well the facts bear you out. Whatever story the police and DAs concoct, that is the story ALL the judges are going to run with, REGARDLESS of the facts! Police, DAs and judges concoct plausible-sounding stories for jurors every day and are excellent demagogues able to duck around all objections and dismiss any facts. Jurors eat up anything judges and DAs puke at them, but will not listen to anything you can say. You have nothing you CAN say because the police have long ago stolen every scrap of evidence you could have used. The only thing you have to answer the cops’ stories with is your screams of innocence. Everybody ‘knows’ that all criminals claim innocence, same as every juror ‘knows’ police, DAs and sworn eyewitlesses can not lie.

It is clear that the courtroom deck is stacked against everyone and anyone the police choose to accuse and target. It is also obvious that nothing about court is fair, once you’ve seen it work on you. So, how do you protect yourself from being a target? Sad to say, you must look completely different from everyone else, and even this is not enough.

You can see how much good my long black hair did for me against a killer five-times described as having short, brown hair;(no glasses). They will just lie up a different description or give no description at all. Police will just teach them to point and say,


Fact is, NOBODY is safe from these robed, badged and silk-suited criminals. Worse, no one CAN be safe from these gangs of official crooks: not until the majority of citizen; WAKE UP and are alerted to the vast range of police, DA, judge, lawyer and legislator crimes-perpetrated against honest citizens.

This book is written as a guide to help point out such corruption engrained into the system over the past 225-plus years. This is the first step in its cure: open minds educating themselves and spreading the word that judge and legislator criminality desperately requires repair and punishment by the honest citizenry. I hope you will make it your duty to make America a fairer, safer place.

  • register politicians; not guns
  • wars don’t kill people politicians do

Before long the insane pro-cop lobby will have us driving cars that detect traffic violations, pull themselves over, lock us in and call the cops and debt a fine from our bank accounts.